|
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:52:14PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>
> > I can enqueue this fix to nf if you like. No need to resend, I can
> > manually apply.
> >
> > Let me know.
>
> It is not critical. I waited weeks the net tree to be
> copied into net-next because it collides with the recent
> "ipvs: make the service replacement more robust" change in
> net tree :) But if a rcu_barrier in the netns cleanup looks
> scary enough you can push it to nf. IMHO, it just adds
> unneeded delay there.
If it is not critical I would prefer for it to travel through
nf-next. Though I do not feel strongly about this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|