LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH net 2/3] ipv6: fill rt6i_gateway with nexthop address

To: ja@xxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] ipv6: fill rt6i_gateway with nexthop address
Cc: hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:42:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:31:06 +0300 (EEST)

>       Thanks for the review! I don't mind too about
> removing rt6_nexthop. For me it is 51% against 49% to keep it
> as it denotes the places that use nexthop and not gateway.
> May be more opinions will help to decide because I don't know
> if there are any plans to use similar techniques as done for IPv4.

I have no strong opinion about removing rt6_nexthop.

If it is of low cost today and makes the code easier to
undersand and grep, just leave it alone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>