Re: get rid of the address_space override in setsockopt v2

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: get rid of the address_space override in setsockopt v2
Cc: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sctp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dccp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-decnet-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-wpan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mptcp@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rds-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-afs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tipc-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-x25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 09:08:42 +0200
On Jul 26 2020, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> From 6601732f7a54db5f04efba08f7e9224e5b757112 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 09:00:09 +0200
> Subject: mISDN: remove a debug printk in data_sock_setsockopt
> The %p won't work with the new sockptr_t type.  But in the times of
> ftrace, bpftrace and co these kinds of debug printks are pretty anyway,

I think there is a word missing after pretty.


Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>