|
Hi Stephane,
Probably stupid, but: have you also checked that VRRP packets are
recieved correctly?
If you start 1 keepalived, does the other see the vrrp? Also: have you
specified different (global def section) router_id's?
Also, can you verify that you can ping LVS node 2 from LVS node 1 and
vice versa. Also verify that it really goes in/out of interface eth0.
With kind regards,
Tom van Leeuwen
On 07/08/2011 02:22 AM, Stephane RIOS wrote:
> Hi all
>
> This is slightly off-topic because it concerns especially keepalived and
> not lvs but i read a lot of posts in this list about keepalived so ...
> I've made a very simple setup of 2 LVS nodes (Debian 5.0) on Rackspace.
> And this setup does not work.
> Here's the MASTER keepalived conf :
>
> global_defs {
> router_id my_router
> }
>
> vrrp_instance app_master {
> state MASTER
> interface eth0
> virtual_router_id 36
> priority 150
> advert_int 1
> nopreempt
> garp_master_delay 5
> virtual_ipaddress {
> 31.222.179.6
> }
> }
>
> The BACKUP conf is quite the same except the "state" and "priority"
> directives of course.
>
> Simple, isn't it ?
>
> The real IPs of the 2 nodes are on the 31.222.176.xxx subnet and the
> virtual IP that Rackspace gave me is 31.222.179.6.
> It seems that everything is working fine except that VRRP packets are
> sent but not received by either one. So immediatly after the keepalived
> daemon start, the BACKUP node enters the MASTER state and i have two
> nodes in MASTER state (huh !).
>
> What i've done to check my config :
>
> - tcpdump -qn net 224.0.0.0/8 : check that the VRRP packets are sent (OK)
> - ip addr list : check that the two nodes got the virtual IP (OK but i
> don't want this !)
> - netstat -g : check that the vrrp.mcast.net (224.0.0.18) multicat
> group is registered on the interface (OK)
> - iptables -F : delete all possible rules that could block
>
> I tried to replicate this config with 2 VMs on my own machine and
> everything worked fine. But I assigned real IPs and virtual IP in the
> same subnet.
> I also tried to add a /22 in the virtual_ipaddress field in the
> keepalived.conf but it didn't solve my problem.
>
> So my question is : does keepalived need to have Virtual IP and real IP
> in the same subnet to work ?
> Do I need to add a routing directive somewhere ?
>
> Thank you for your help
>
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
