Current versions of ipvsadm include "/usr/src/linux/include/net/ip_vs.h" directly. This file also contains kernel-only definitions. Normally, public definitions should live in include/linux, so this
Hi Julius, Firstly these changes look fine: Acked Secondly, What are your plans for ipvsadm? Do you think that a fork will be neccessasry to utilise the netlink interface? Or even a new tool with a c
Thanks! Vince is converting the latest available ipvsadm version to support the Netlink interface and IPv6 features. So ideally, there will be no fork or new tool, just a new version. We are keeping
That sounds great. -- Horms -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
Current versions of ipvsadm include "/usr/src/linux/include/net/ip_vs.h" directly. This file also contains kernel-only definitions. Normally, public definitions should live in include/linux, so this
Userland exported headers need to have an entry in include/linux/Kbuild Since this linux/ip_vs.h file is new, a new entry needs to be added there. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. Julius, I think this is the bit we are missing: Index: net-next-2.6/include/linux/Kbuild == -- net-next-2.6.orig/include/linux/Kbuild 2008-07-24 10:15:52.000000000 +10
Oh, me neither. Thanks, I'll post the patch again with this! Julius -- Google Switzerland GmbH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majo
Current versions of ipvsadm include "/usr/src/linux/include/net/ip_vs.h" directly. This file also contains kernel-only definitions. Normally, public definitions should live in include/linux, so this
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Horms -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info
Simon Horman wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:14:49PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: Current versions of ipvsadm include "/usr/src/linux/include/net/ip_vs.h" directly. This file also contains kernel-only
This doesn't seem to be used at all anymore, but I didn't want to remove it in the same patch... should I? Unfortunately, these structs all have to stay as they are because they are used by old ipvsa
Julius Volz wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: +/* Move it to better place one day, for now keep it unique */ +#define NFC_IPVS_PROPERTY 0x10000 Does thi
I don't think so. It was once used as a bitmask into skb->nfcache, which does not even exist anymore. There's no use of it in the current ipvsadm. I think it can go away, I'll post an updated patch a
Current versions of ipvsadm include "/usr/src/linux/include/net/ip_vs.h" directly. This file also contains kernel-only definitions. Normally, public definitions should live in include/linux, so this
I'm pretty sure that it is safe to get rid of NFC_IPVS_PROPERTY -- Horms -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http:/
Current versions of ipvsadm include "/usr/src/linux/include/net/ip_vs.h" directly. This file also contains kernel-only definitions. Normally, public definitions should live in include/linux, so this
Applied, thanks everyone. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/m