Hello, i wrote a very simple patch for ipvs that enables a kernel config option that allows to choose where IPVS intercepts incoming connections. These are the options: - LOCAL_IN (default: works as
Hello, i wrote a very simple patch for ipvs that enables a kernel config option that allows to choose where IPVS intercepts incoming connections. These are the options: - LOCAL_IN (default: works as
Hello, i wrote a very simple patch for ipvs that enables a kernel config option that allows to choose where IPVS intercepts incoming connections. These are the options: - LOCAL_IN (default: works as
First up, thanks for the patch. Its clean and looks obviously correct. I think we should aim to get this in 2.4.25 (I think its a bit late for 2.4.24, but perhaps it can go in there). I had always th
Sorry, I was a bit to fast on the trigger-button when I sent the previous patch. I checked that it applied against net-2.4.25, but I hadn't yet checked that it compiled. I have now done that for both
But you do make some good points there, and I'm begining to think that PREROUTING is correct. Having LVS in LOCAL_IN was a reasonable idea at the time, but then people came up with new things to do
I've attached patches for net-2.6 (works on 2.6.24-2.6.22) and net-2.6.25. I've made some cosmetic/description changes and added a "FORWARD" option that puts LVS into INPUT *and* FORWARD hooks, now t
I've attached patches for net-2.6 (works on 2.6.24-2.6.22) and net-2.6.25. I've made some cosmetic/description changes and added a "FORWARD" option that puts LVS into INPUT *and* FORWARD hooks, now t
[snip] Yes, a proc file was what I had in mind. I think that the best thing to do would be to code it up as a separate (additional) patch and if it flies you or I can send it on to netdev. Last time
Hi all Absolutely. And thanks - this is brilliant, I feel it'll give LVS some more momentum. +1 (and more) from me. The ability to make this sort of change without rebooting will be *amazing*. Think
Hello, Yes, can you explain with example (nodes, packets they send) what happens with LOCAL_IN handling and what with PRE_ROUTING for your setup? I'm not sure that working before routing is acceptabl
Hello, Yes, thanks. I now see the problem with LVS-LOCALNODE for squids. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of
(I forgot to CC it to the mailing list) Hello, I tried it on some test boxes and it seems to work pretty well, i'll do some stress testing in the next few days. I could send you a setup example if yo
Are there any chances that my patches get merged in 2.6.25? :) Thanks, Raphael Am 21.01.2008 um 18:32 schrieb Raphael Vallazza: (I forgot to CC it to the mailing list) Hello, I tried it on some test