- 1. Re: [PATCH] netfilter: mark expected switch fall-throughs (score: 1)
- Author: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 07:30:45 -0600
- Hello Pablo, Quoting Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Hi Gustavo, On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:06:16AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c b/net/net
- /html/lvs-devel/2017-11/msg00008.html (11,998 bytes)
- 2. Re: [PATCH] netfilter: mark expected switch fall-throughs (score: 1)
- Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 02:07:29 +0100
- Hi Gustavo, Just replace this comment by /* fall through */, I think it's enough to remember that this is intentional. [...] Same thing here, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "
- /html/lvs-devel/2017-11/msg00007.html (10,821 bytes)
- 3. [PATCH] netfilter: mark expected switch fall-throughs (score: 1)
- Author: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:06:16 -0500
- In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in some cases I placed the "fall through" comment on its own line, which is wh
- /html/lvs-devel/2017-10/msg00005.html (13,918 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu