Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+04\/26\]\s+net\:\s+add\s+a\s+new\s+sockptr

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+04\/26\]\s+net\:\s+add\s+a\s+new\s+sockptr_t\s+type\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH 04/26] net: add a new sockptr_t type (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:44:32 +0200; It was originally intended to be generic and called uptr_t, based on me misunderstanding that Linus wanted a file operation for it, which he absolutely didn't and hate with passion. So the plan is to; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00127.html (13,566 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 04/26] net: add a new sockptr_t type (score: 1): Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:40:27 -0700; I am not sure why you chose sockptr_t for something that really seems generic. Or is it really meant to be exclusive to setsockopt() and/or getsockopt() ? If the first user of this had been futex cod; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00126.html (14,896 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 04/26] net: add a new sockptr_t type (score: 1): Author: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:40:49 +0200 (CEST); """If the member used to access the contents of a union is not the same as the member last used to store a value, the object representation of the value that was stored is reinterpreted as an object; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00125.html (14,224 bytes)
4. [PATCH 04/26] net: add a new sockptr_t type (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:08:46 +0200; Add a uptr_t type that can hold a pointer to either a user or kernel memory region, and simply helpers to copy to and from it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> -- include/linux/sockptr.h; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00114.html (15,563 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]