Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+06\/34\]\s+ipvs\:\s+no\s+need\s+to\s+reroute\s+anymore\s+on\s+DNAT\s+over\s+loopback\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH 06/34] ipvs: no need to reroute anymore on DNAT over loopback (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 23:47:01 +0200 (EET)
Hello, Sigh. I missed this rule from Nov 2011. It seems checkpatch.pl can not stop such crimes to occur :) Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
/html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00180.html (13,914 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 06/34] ipvs: no need to reroute anymore on DNAT over loopback (score: 1)
Author: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:44:06 +0400
Hello. After commit 70e7341673 (ipv4: Show that ip_send_reply() is purely unicast routine.) we do not need to reroute DNAT-ed traffic over loopback because reply uses iph daddr and not rt_spec_dst. S
/html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00179.html (13,918 bytes)

3. [PATCH 06/34] ipvs: no need to reroute anymore on DNAT over loopback (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:11:23 +0900
After commit 70e7341673 (ipv4: Show that ip_send_reply() is purely unicast routine.) we do not need to reroute DNAT-ed traffic over loopback because reply uses iph daddr and not rt_spec_dst. Signed-o
/html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00178.html (13,901 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu