- 1. Re: [PATCH 06/34] ipvs: no need to reroute anymore on DNAT over loopback (score: 1)
- Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 23:47:01 +0200 (EET)
- Hello, Sigh. I missed this rule from Nov 2011. It seems checkpatch.pl can not stop such crimes to occur :) Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00180.html (13,914 bytes)
- 2. Re: [PATCH 06/34] ipvs: no need to reroute anymore on DNAT over loopback (score: 1)
- Author: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:44:06 +0400
- Hello. After commit 70e7341673 (ipv4: Show that ip_send_reply() is purely unicast routine.) we do not need to reroute DNAT-ed traffic over loopback because reply uses iph daddr and not rt_spec_dst. S
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00179.html (13,918 bytes)
- 3. [PATCH 06/34] ipvs: no need to reroute anymore on DNAT over loopback (score: 1)
- Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:11:23 +0900
- After commit 70e7341673 (ipv4: Show that ip_send_reply() is purely unicast routine.) we do not need to reroute DNAT-ed traffic over loopback because reply uses iph daddr and not rt_spec_dst. Signed-o
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00178.html (13,901 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu