Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+V2\s+2\/2\]\s+ipvs\:\s+Extend\s+MTU\s+check\s+to\s+account\s+for\s+IPv6\s+NAT\s+defrag\s+changes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+V2\s+2\/2\]\s+ipvs\:\s+Extend\s+MTU\s+check\s+to\s+account\s+for\s+IPv6\s+NAT\s+defrag\s+changes\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] ipvs: Extend MTU check to account for IPv6 NAT defrag changes (score: 1): Author: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:04:13 +0200; Nope... not if its a defragmented/reassembled packet. These changes have to be seen together with Patrick's patch: "netfilter: nf_conntrack_ipv6: improve fragmentation handling" http://thread.gmane.o; /html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00052.html (16,248 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] ipvs: Extend MTU check to account for IPv6 NAT defrag changes (score: 1): Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:43:05 -0700; If the packet was not fragmented, its was a single frame. But if this frame length is above mtu, packet is not too big ? Sorry if its a stupid question. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the lin; /html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00051.html (14,810 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] ipvs: Extend MTU check to account for IPv6 NAT defrag changes (score: 1): Author: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:02:39 +0200; Implicit: else return false (if it makes it more clear, not sure) Nope, this will not work. If (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size > 0) then we have a defragmented packet, this means that skb->len cannot be u; /html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00050.html (15,024 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] ipvs: Extend MTU check to account for IPv6 NAT defrag changes (score: 1): Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:10:00 +0200 (MEST); This patch is necessary, to make IPVS work, after Patrick McHardys IPv6 NAT defragmentation changes. Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> I've folded this into the defragmentati; /html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00049.html (11,917 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] ipvs: Extend MTU check to account for IPv6 NAT defrag changes (score: 1): Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:49:19 -0700; Couldnt you use a single test ? if (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size > mtu) return true; if (skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) return true; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs; /html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00047.html (12,987 bytes)
6. [PATCH V2 2/2] ipvs: Extend MTU check to account for IPv6 NAT defrag changes (score: 1): Author: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:23:33 +0200; This patch is necessary, to make IPVS work, after Patrick McHardys IPv6 NAT defragmentation changes. Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> -- In V2: the tunnel mode is no longer a; /html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00046.html (12,590 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]