Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+ipvs\,v4\s+19\/20\]\s+ipvs\:\s+use\s+the\s+new\s+dest\s+addr\s+family\s+field\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+ipvs\,v4\s+19\/20\]\s+ipvs\:\s+use\s+the\s+new\s+dest\s+addr\s+family\s+field\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH ipvs,v4 19/20] ipvs: use the new dest addr family field (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:05:55 +0300 (EEST); Hello, Thanks! I guess this is related to formatting of output, you can submit it as official change, so that we can apply all pending changes to the ipvsadm tree. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxx; /html/lvs-devel/2014-09/msg00035.html (11,293 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH ipvs,v4 19/20] ipvs: use the new dest addr family field (score: 1): Author: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 16:22:38 -0700; Hey Julian, Hello Alex, So, if I understand correctly, we'll wait until it lands in net-next and then I'll submit these patches to netdev? I think, you can now submit the patchset, net was merged to; /html/lvs-devel/2014-09/msg00012.html (11,554 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH ipvs,v4 19/20] ipvs: use the new dest addr family field (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 22:41:11 +0300 (EEST); Hello Alex, I think, you can now submit the patchset, net was merged to net-next, so you need a fresh net-next copy. Also, can you try my ipvsadm patches to check for possible problems in the connect; /html/lvs-devel/2014-09/msg00011.html (9,618 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH ipvs,v4 19/20] ipvs: use the new dest addr family field (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:17:14 +0900; I'd prefer if Alex reposted them when the time comes to apply them. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More; /html/lvs-devel/2014-09/msg00000.html (9,807 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH ipvs,v4 19/20] ipvs: use the new dest addr family field (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 11:35:18 +0300 (EEST); Hello, ok Yes, we'll wait the patch but then post them again here, so that Simon can apply them to ipvs-next. Simon then adds netdev to CC list. Simon can say if he agrees to keep them somewhere unti; /html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00095.html (12,471 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH ipvs,v4 19/20] ipvs: use the new dest addr family field (score: 1): Author: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:19:04 -0700; Hey Hello, Use the new address family field cp->daf when printing Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx> ... -- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c; /html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00093.html (14,146 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH ipvs,v4 19/20] ipvs: use the new dest addr family field (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:32:13 +0300 (EEST); Hello, ... Thanks! Note that for v4 we use 8+1 (hex). All other patches look ok. It is early to ack them, right? We need to post them again at the right time. I hope "ipvs: properly declare tunnel en; /html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00092.html (12,988 bytes)
8. [PATCH ipvs,v4 19/20] ipvs: use the new dest addr family field (score: 1): Author: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 01:39:08 -0700; Use the new address family field cp->daf when printing Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx> -- net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c | 49 ++++++++++++; /html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00085.html (22,466 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]