Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\]\s+ipvs\:\s+properly\s+declare\s+tunnel\s+encapsulation\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: properly declare tunnel encapsulation (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:52:06 +0900
Thanks, and sorry for letting that slip through the cracks. I'll queue it up ASAP. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxx
/html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00043.html (12,943 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: properly declare tunnel encapsulation (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:04:21 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, Don't forget "ipvs: fix ipv6 hook registration for local replies" from August 22. It is a bugfix too. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u
/html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00041.html (12,078 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: properly declare tunnel encapsulation (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:33:24 +0900
Sure, I'll do as you suggest. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.o
/html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00036.html (11,429 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: properly declare tunnel encapsulation (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:11:38 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, May be we should apply it as bugfix to ipvs tree. Later stable kernels may need it. Also, new changes from Alex Gartrell about tunneling depend on it, they are net-next material, still in deve
/html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00035.html (10,934 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: properly declare tunnel encapsulation (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:49:19 +0900
Thanks, understood. I have applied (only) this patch to ipvs-next. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More m
/html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00034.html (10,177 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: properly declare tunnel encapsulation (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 08:13:14 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, Not needed, we prefer to avoid csum calculation by CPU. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message
/html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00033.html (9,749 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: properly declare tunnel encapsulation (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:18:52 +0900
With this patch is Alex's patch "[PATCH ipvs] ipvs: invoke skb_checksum_help prior to encapsulation in tunnel xmit " also needed? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-deve
/html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00032.html (14,236 bytes)

8. [PATCH net] ipvs: properly declare tunnel encapsulation (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 10:36:17 +0300
The tunneling method should properly use tunnel encapsulation. Fixes problem with CHECKSUM_PARTIAL packets when TCP/UDP csum offload is supported. Thanks to Alex Gartrell for reporting the problem, p
/html/lvs-devel/2014-08/msg00000.html (11,725 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu