Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\]\s+ipvs\:\s+sctp\:\s+fix\s+checksumming\s+by\s+adding\s+hardware\s+offload\s+support\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\]\s+ipvs\:\s+sctp\:\s+fix\s+checksumming\s+by\s+adding\s+hardware\s+offload\s+support\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: sctp: fix checksumming by adding hardware offload support (score: 1): Author: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:54:18 +0100; In our test lab, we have a simple SCTP client connecting to a SCTP server via an IPVS load balancer. On some machines, load balancing works, but on others the initial handshake just fails, thus no S; /html/lvs-devel/2013-02/msg00007.html (17,595 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: sctp: fix checksumming by adding hardware offload support (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 01:27:34 +0200 (EET); Hello, Hm, may be packet is received with CHECKSUM_PARTIAL value? Is it a virtual NIC or a real NIC with the forwarding problem? So, if NIC has no such support the bug remains? Why it works for some; /html/lvs-devel/2013-02/msg00002.html (16,555 bytes)
3. [PATCH net] ipvs: sctp: fix checksumming by adding hardware offload support (score: 1): Author: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:27:54 +0100; In our test lab, we have a simple SCTP client connecting to a SCTP server via an IPVS load balancer. On some machines, load balancing works, but on others the initial handshake just fails, thus no SC; /html/lvs-devel/2013-02/msg00001.html (13,174 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]