Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\-next\s+00\/19\]\s+IPVS\s+optimizations\,\s+part\s+2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\-next\s+00\/19\]\s+IPVS\s+optimizations\,\s+part\s+2\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH net-next 00/19] IPVS optimizations, part 2 (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:05:27 +0900; Thanks, I'll apply these changes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kern; /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00143.html (13,968 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH net-next 00/19] IPVS optimizations, part 2 (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:57:12 +0200 (EET); Hello, Yes, I posted 2 parts with optimizations. Part 1 is at v3 while part 2 is at its first version. Both series are ready for applying. BTW, Hans plans more tests in the next days, may be we will; /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00140.html (13,502 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH net-next 00/19] IPVS optimizations, part 2 (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:41:28 +0900; Hi Julian, what is the status of this series? N.B: THis series is different to "[PATCH 00/15 v3] IPVS optimizations (repost)" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" i; /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00138.html (12,826 bytes)
4. [PATCH net-next 00/19] IPVS optimizations, part 2 (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:46:35 +0200; This is the second patchset with IPVS optimizations. Now we convert the schedulers, dests and services to RCU. All patches are for net-next based on the first patchset v3. The idea is after discussio; /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00109.html (14,210 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]