Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\-next\s+2\/3\]\s+ipvs\:\s+replace\s+the\s+SCTP\s+state\s+machine\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\-next\s+2\/3\]\s+ipvs\:\s+replace\s+the\s+SCTP\s+state\s+machine\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ipvs: replace the SCTP state machine (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:43:32 +0900; Thanks. I think it would be best to send the changes that we have so far and then send another batch when new patches are ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel; /html/lvs-devel/2013-06/msg00069.html (11,161 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ipvs: replace the SCTP state machine (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:33:06 +0300 (EEST); Hello, Thanks, no problem. OK. In the next days after tests by Aleksey Chudov we will know about the last patch from me: "ipvs: add sync_persist_mode flag". I'll post an official version on success.; /html/lvs-devel/2013-06/msg00068.html (10,603 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ipvs: replace the SCTP state machine (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:16:58 +0900; Thanks, and sorry for being a bit slow. Pablo has accepted patch 1 into his nf tree via my ipvs tree. At this stage I expect it to show up in net and v3.10. I have queued-up the remaining patches tha; /html/lvs-devel/2013-06/msg00063.html (12,639 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ipvs: replace the SCTP state machine (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:49:35 +0300 (EEST); Hello, I forgot to mention that this patchset follows the "ipvs: sloppy TCP and SCTP" change from Alexander Frolkin posted on June 13. Our plans are for following list: 1. ipvs: sloppy TCP and SCTP (; /html/lvs-devel/2013-06/msg00053.html (11,647 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ipvs: replace the SCTP state machine (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:52:57 +0900; Hi Julian, I am having trouble applying the first ip_vs_proto_sctp.c hunk. I have tried against net-next, nf-next and ipvs-next. Could you rebase it on the later and repost it with the second patch o; /html/lvs-devel/2013-06/msg00050.html (65,892 bytes)
6. [PATCH net-next 2/3] ipvs: replace the SCTP state machine (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:08:07 +0300; Convert the SCTP state table, so that it is more readable. Change the states to be according to the diagram in RFC 2960 and add more states suitable for middle box. Still, such change in states adds; /html/lvs-devel/2013-06/msg00044.html (55,001 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]