Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\-next\s+3\/6\]\s+ipvs\:\s+fix\s+sparse\s+warnings\s+in\s+lblc\s+and\s+lblcr\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] ipvs: fix sparse warnings in lblc and lblcr (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:53:40 +0900
Thanks, I have queued-up the change in ipvs-next. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at
/html/lvs-devel/2013-04/msg00029.html (15,368 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] ipvs: fix sparse warnings in lblc and lblcr (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:46:57 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, IMHO, because __rcu should be used only for pointers, not for struct hlist_head. The *list*_rcu methods enforce __rcu internally for the pointers. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To
/html/lvs-devel/2013-04/msg00027.html (14,246 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] ipvs: fix sparse warnings in lblc and lblcr (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:46:24 +0900
Hi Julian, perhaps only for my benefit, but could you explain why the annotations are unnecessary? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to
/html/lvs-devel/2013-04/msg00021.html (13,424 bytes)

4. [PATCH net-next 3/6] ipvs: fix sparse warnings in lblc and lblcr (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:50:47 +0300
kbuild test robot reports for sparse warnings in commits c2a4ffb70eef39 ("ipvs: convert lblc scheduler to rcu") and c5549571f975ab ("ipvs: convert lblcr scheduler to rcu"). Fix it by removing extra _
/html/lvs-devel/2013-04/msg00016.html (11,706 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu