Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+v2\s+ipvs\-next\]\s+net\:\s+ipvs\:\s+sctp\:\s+do\s+not\s+recalc\s+sctp\s+csum\s+when\s+ports\s+didn\'t\s+change\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+v2\s+ipvs\-next\]\s+net\:\s+ipvs\:\s+sctp\:\s+do\s+not\s+recalc\s+sctp\s+csum\s+when\s+ports\s+didn\'t\s+change\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH v2 ipvs-next] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp csum when ports didn't change (score: 1): Author: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:47:25 +0100; ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition + if (!(ret = ip_vs_app_pkt_out(cp, skb))) ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition + if (!(ret = ip_vs_app_pkt_in(cp, skb))) total: 2 errors, 0 warni; /html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00075.html (10,612 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH v2 ipvs-next] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp csum when ports didn't change (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:44:51 +0200 (EET); Hello, Sorry, just now noticed the errors from scripts/checkpatch.pl: ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition + if (!(ret = ip_vs_app_pkt_out(cp, skb))) ERROR: do not use assignment in if condit; /html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00074.html (10,770 bytes)
3. [PATCH v2 ipvs-next] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp csum when ports didn't change (score: 1): Author: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:14:55 +0100; Unlike UDP or TCP, we do not take the pseudo-header into account in SCTP checksums. So in case port mapping is the very same, we do not need to recalculate the whole SCTP checksum in software, which; /html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00072.html (15,317 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]