Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+v3\s+ipvs\-next\]\s+net\:\s+ipvs\:\s+sctp\:\s+do\s+not\s+recalc\s+sctp\s+csum\s+when\s+ports\s+didn\'t\s+change\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+v3\s+ipvs\-next\]\s+net\:\s+ipvs\:\s+sctp\:\s+do\s+not\s+recalc\s+sctp\s+csum\s+when\s+ports\s+didn\'t\s+change\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH v3 ipvs-next] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp csum when ports didn't change (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:48:46 +0900; Thanks, I have queued this up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.; /html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00078.html (12,454 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH v3 ipvs-next] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp csum when ports didn't change (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:43:26 +0200 (EET); Hello, Looks good, thanks! Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a; /html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00077.html (16,677 bytes)
3. [PATCH v3 ipvs-next] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp csum when ports didn't change (score: 1): Author: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:56:20 +0100; Unlike UDP or TCP, we do not take the pseudo-header into account in SCTP checksums. So in case port mapping is the very same, we do not need to recalculate the whole SCTP checksum in software, which; /html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00076.html (14,532 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]