Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCHv2\s+net\-next\s+01\/15\]\s+net\:\s+add\s+skb_dst_set

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCHv2\s+net\-next\s+01\/15\]\s+net\:\s+add\s+skb_dst_set_unref\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 01/15] net: add skb_dst_set_unref (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:05:56 +0200 (EET); Hello, Done, I'll wait a week for more feedback... Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordom; /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00052.html (12,216 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 01/15] net: add skb_dst_set_unref (score: 1): Author: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:00:04 -0400 (EDT); Yes, but with one minor change: I keep forgetting the && vs. & operator precedence, and so do many other people, so please put parenthesis around the "dst->flags & DST_NOCACHE" expression, thanks. --; /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00051.html (11,910 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 01/15] net: add skb_dst_set_unref (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:37:34 +0200 (EET); Hello, The idea looks good, here is the implementation. Can I use it in this form for next patchset versions? net: add skb_dst_set_noref_force Rename skb_dst_set_noref to __skb_dst_set_noref and add; /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00049.html (16,211 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 01/15] net: add skb_dst_set_unref (score: 1): Author: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 05:17:35 -0400 (EDT); I'm fine with this approach, but I think the name of this interface could be better. In fact you could do something like: 1) Rename skb_dst_set_noref() to __skb_dst_set_noref() and add a new "bool fo; /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00048.html (12,043 bytes)
5. [PATCHv2 net-next 01/15] net: add skb_dst_set_unref (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 23:16:41 +0200; skb_dst_set_unref will use noref version even for DST_NOCACHE entries because DST_NOCACHE means dst is not cached in routing structures, still dst could be cached by routing users and used to produce; /html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00034.html (12,290 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]