Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Patch\s+resend\s+nf\]\s+ipvs\:\s+fix\s+AF\s+assignment\s+in\s+ip_vs_conn

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Patch\s+resend\s+nf\]\s+ipvs\:\s+fix\s+AF\s+assignment\s+in\s+ip_vs_conn_new\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Patch resend nf] ipvs: fix AF assignment in ip_vs_conn_new() (score: 1): Author: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:39:04 +0100; Sorry for that, looks like I ran the test build after adapting to current code with a config which didn't actually compile this file. I'll send a v2 after testing a fixed version and I'll also extend; /html/lvs-devel/2014-01/msg00009.html (11,446 bytes)
2. Re: [Patch resend nf] ipvs: fix AF assignment in ip_vs_conn_new() (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 23:24:17 +0200 (EET); Hello, Patch does not compile due to vaddr and p->daddr usage but you are in the right direction. Such change should fix a problem where connection templates don't get full IPv6 address for the real; /html/lvs-devel/2014-01/msg00006.html (11,442 bytes)
3. [Patch resend nf] ipvs: fix AF assignment in ip_vs_conn_new() (score: 1): Author: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:54:37 +0100 (CET); If a fwmark is passed to ip_vs_conn_new(), it is passed in vaddr, not daddr. Therefore we should set AF to AF_UNSPEC in vaddr assignment (like we do in ip_vs_ct_in_get()). Signed-off-by: Bogdano Aren; /html/lvs-devel/2014-01/msg00005.html (10,399 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]