- 1. Re: [lvs-users] -x (or --u-threshold) Limits Not Working Right (score: 1)
- Author: "Robinson, Eric" <eric.robinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:46:23 -0800
- I did check for that. When I ran ipvsadm, I saw only a few inactive connections, perhaps less than 5 or 6. The total active+inactive did not appear to be anywhere near the -x threshold, which is wha
- /html/lvs-users/2012-02/msg00017.html (10,875 bytes)
- 2. Re: [lvs-users] -x (or --u-threshold) Limits Not Working Right (score: 1)
- Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:03:11 +0200 (EET)
- Hello, The algorithm counts both active and inactive connections when checking the threshold, i.e. states before and after ESTABLISHED. It hurts that SYN states are counted as inactive because it cau
- /html/lvs-users/2012-02/msg00013.html (10,071 bytes)
- 3. [lvs-users] -x (or --u-threshold) Limits Not Working Right (score: 1)
- Author: "Robinson, Eric" <eric.robinson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:35:37 -0800
- I have a pair of Windows terminal servers behind my load balancer. I want to make sure that neither terminal ever gets more than 150 connections, so I specified the -x (or --u-threshold) parameter ac
- /html/lvs-users/2012-02/msg00011.html (9,782 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu