Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Blocking\s+LVS\s+probles\s+with\s+iptables\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Blocking\s+LVS\s+probles\s+with\s+iptables\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Blocking LVS probles with iptables (score: 1): Author: Hallvard Breien Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:15:37 +0100; Then I'd have to mail the people running the load balancer. Or am I missing some existing protocol which lets me do this? Anyway, it seems simpler and cleaner if the realserver's state vs. the load b; /html/lvs-users/2017-11/msg00011.html (9,765 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] Blocking LVS probles with iptables (score: 1): Author: Michael Schwartzkopff <ms@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:55:14 +0100; Am 20.11.2017 um 15:38 schrieb Hallvard Breien Furuseth: Why you just set its weight to zero? Mit freundlichen Grüßen, -- [*] sys4 AG https://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG,; /html/lvs-users/2017-11/msg00010.html (11,798 bytes)
3. [lvs-users] Blocking LVS probles with iptables (score: 1): Author: Hallvard Breien Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:38:59 +0100; I want a realserver to temporarily tell the load balancer to not send new connections, but to keep old connections. This seems to work, is it OK? LB_dip=111.22.33.44/31 # Load balancer - director ipt; /html/lvs-users/2017-11/msg00009.html (9,828 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]