Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Difference\s+between\s+NAT\s+and\s+FullNAT\s+\-\s+help\s+needed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Difference\s+between\s+NAT\s+and\s+FullNAT\s+\-\s+help\s+needed\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Difference between NAT and FullNAT - help needed (score: 1): Author: Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:58:11 +0100; --Ursprüngliche Nachricht-- Von: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Thank you. now i have the last piece of puzzle ;) Stefan _______________________________________________ Please read the documentati; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00007.html (10,332 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] Difference between NAT and FullNAT - help needed (score: 1): Author: Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:57:02 +0100; --Ursprüngliche Nachricht-- Von: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sure, but this is done automatically as by the SRC-NAT, the real-servers will automatically send the answer to the source back. No n; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00006.html (10,147 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] Difference between NAT and FullNAT - help needed (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:08:10 +0900; Sorry, I missed your point. As the return packets will be addressed to the linux-director I think that you are correct and that a default (or other) route via the linux-director should not be necessa; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00005.html (12,045 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] Difference between NAT and FullNAT - help needed (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:05:51 +0900; Return packets still need to travel through the linux-director as the Full-NAT as the address translations need to be reversed. _______________________________________________ Please read the documen; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00004.html (11,548 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] Difference between NAT and FullNAT - help needed (score: 1): Author: Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:42:25 +0100; --Ursprüngliche Nachricht-- Von: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> So the linux-director does not have to be the default-gw for the real-servers anymore with Full-NAT? Stefan ________________________; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00003.html (10,681 bytes)
6. Re: [lvs-users] Difference between NAT and FullNAT - help needed (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:48:46 +0900; Traditionally IPVS-NAT has worked in the form of destination-NAT, that is modifying the destination IP address to that of the real-server. This works well for in a wide range of circumstances. More r; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00002.html (9,895 bytes)
7. [lvs-users] Difference between NAT and FullNAT - help needed (score: 1): Author: Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:18:27 +0100; Dear IPVS Users & Developers, i followed with much interest the development of IPVS. Thank you for this great piece of software. Previosly there was a new method introduced - called FullNAT. I can no; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00001.html (9,502 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]