Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Help\s+with\s+LVS\s+NAT\s+and\s+RHEL5\.8\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Help\s+with\s+LVS\s+NAT\s+and\s+RHEL5\.8\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Help with LVS NAT and RHEL5.8 (score: 1): Author: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:49:43 +0200; As far as I know the NAT stands for DNAT not SNAT so the source address doesn't change but the destination address is changed to the ip of the realserver. The realserver has to have the director as i; /html/lvs-users/2012-07/msg00021.html (11,904 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] Help with LVS NAT and RHEL5.8 (score: 1): Author: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:43:41 +0100; Liu, Yes, David is right it is working as expected Full-NAT i.e. source IP transparent. If you want the real servers/backend servers to have Internet access as well then you will need an iptables mas; /html/lvs-users/2012-07/msg00020.html (12,800 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] Help with LVS NAT and RHEL5.8 (score: 1): Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:23:55 -0400; There is a SNAT patch for LVS out on the Internet somewhere, but it is not supported by RedHat. With RHEL, none of the three (DR,NAT, TUN) mechanisms modify the source IP of the packets. If you use L; /html/lvs-users/2012-07/msg00019.html (10,892 bytes)
4. [lvs-users] Help with LVS NAT and RHEL5.8 (score: 1): Author: "Liu, William" <wliu@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:40:52 +0100; Hi, I am a problem with LVS NAT configuration where the packets do not look like they are being masqueraded by LVS. Here's my setup: LVS server has 3 interfaces: primary, nat_router, virtual IP 172.5; /html/lvs-users/2012-07/msg00018.html (10,806 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]