- 1. Re: [lvs-users] Highest weight only scheduling (score: 1)
- Author: Rob Smith <kormoc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:09:30 -0800
- Hi Anders, Thank you for the very informative and comprehensive reply. We decided that using 65535/1 would work well enough for our use case. Thanks again, ~Rob ______________________________________
- /html/lvs-users/2013-01/msg00007.html (9,136 bytes)
- 2. Re: [lvs-users] Highest weight only scheduling (score: 1)
- Author: Anders Henke <anders.henke@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:50:56 +0100
- None of the current IPVS schedulers do know "highest weight" balancing. With the "weighted" schedulers, you can e.g. give your primary server a weight of max. 65535 and your secondary server a weight
- /html/lvs-users/2013-01/msg00006.html (11,627 bytes)
- 3. [lvs-users] Highest weight only scheduling (score: 1)
- Author: Rob Smith <kormoc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:28:54 -0800
- Hi everybody, I have a keepalived setup with three servers behind an ip. One is setup as a sorry server and only serves the maintenance pages, the other two are actual servers. We would like it setup
- /html/lvs-users/2013-01/msg00003.html (8,949 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu