Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Is\s+\-\-timeout\s+intended\s+as\s+non\-persistent\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Is\s+\-\-timeout\s+intended\s+as\s+non\-persistent\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent? (score: 1): Author: Kendrick Gay <kgay@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:30:45 -0400 (EDT); Excellent, that's invaluable information. Thanks! Firstly what we're talking about here is "--set". From the man page: --set tcp tcpfin udp Change the timeout values used for IPVS connections. This c; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00038.html (11,970 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent? (score: 1): Author: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:14:26 +0100; Firstly what we're talking about here is "--set". From the man page: --set tcp tcpfin udp Change the timeout values used for IPVS connections. This command always takes 3 parameters, representing the; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00037.html (10,910 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent? (score: 1): Author: Kendrick Gay <kgay@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:47:47 -0400 (EDT); Is there a particular reason they're non-persistent, or do you think this would this be a plausible a feature request? Kendrick, I don't think anyone will be too worried about how Piranha works on th; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00036.html (10,788 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent? (score: 1): Author: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:02:11 +0100; Kendrick, I don't think anyone will be too worried about how Piranha works on this list... But most people just put the TCP timeout settings in rc.local or rc.firewall or some other bootscript as the; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00035.html (9,754 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent? (score: 1): Author: Kendrick Gay <kgay@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:43:18 -0400 (EDT); It looks like they're asking how to set the TCP timeout value persistently, as opposed to a virtual service? I apologies in advance for my ignorance of LVS. Let me give you my client's inquiries in t; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00034.html (13,744 bytes)
6. Re: [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent? (score: 1): Author: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:22:43 +0100; --timeout is an option for the "-L" switch and is informational only. Persistence timeout is set using the "-p" switch, which *is* displayed using "-S" (this one is using fwmarks rather than IP addre; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00033.html (9,440 bytes)
7. [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent? (score: 1): Author: Kendrick Gay <kgay@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:08:54 -0400 (EDT); I've been working with a client who notes that the only way to set --timeout persistently in Red Hat Enterprise Linux is to directly apply it to the /etc/sysconfig/ipvsadm file. A reboot seems to ind; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00031.html (8,783 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]