- 1. Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR performance not good as expected (score: 1)
- Author: Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:22:28 +0800
- But after I increased the users, I can got 12000/min with direct access, LVS-DR could not, is is normal ? So for transactions on short lived tcp connection, large roundtrip can not achieve high perfo
- /html/lvs-users/2013-03/msg00031.html (12,543 bytes)
- 2. Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR performance not good as expected (score: 1)
- Author: Anders Henke <anders.henke@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:27:42 +0100
- [...] In some areas, the performance impact by virtualization is dramatically high (especially in networking), in others the performance impact (cpu-intensive tasks like calculation) it can be as low
- /html/lvs-users/2013-03/msg00030.html (13,380 bytes)
- 3. [lvs-users] LVS-DR performance not good as expected (score: 1)
- Author: Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:29:48 +0800
- Hi all, I setup a testing LVS-DR cluster, use 1 director with 8 Windows real server. ALL server running as VMware ESX 5.1 guest. The director have 2 cores (X7550@2GHz), 2 GB memory, Debian 6.0 with k
- /html/lvs-users/2013-03/msg00029.html (9,092 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu