Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+LVS\-DR\s+performance\s+not\s+good\s+as\s+expected\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR performance not good as expected (score: 1)
Author: Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:22:28 +0800
But after I increased the users, I can got 12000/min with direct access, LVS-DR could not, is is normal ? So for transactions on short lived tcp connection, large roundtrip can not achieve high perfo
/html/lvs-users/2013-03/msg00031.html (12,543 bytes)

2. Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR performance not good as expected (score: 1)
Author: Anders Henke <anders.henke@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:27:42 +0100
[...] In some areas, the performance impact by virtualization is dramatically high (especially in networking), in others the performance impact (cpu-intensive tasks like calculation) it can be as low
/html/lvs-users/2013-03/msg00030.html (13,380 bytes)

3. [lvs-users] LVS-DR performance not good as expected (score: 1)
Author: Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:29:48 +0800
Hi all, I setup a testing LVS-DR cluster, use 1 director with 8 Windows real server. ALL server running as VMware ESX 5.1 guest. The director have 2 cores (X7550@2GHz), 2 GB memory, Debian 6.0 with k
/html/lvs-users/2013-03/msg00029.html (9,092 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu