Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Micro\s+ipvsadm\s+patch\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Micro\s+ipvsadm\s+patch\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Micro ipvsadm patch (score: 1): Author: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:09:03 +0100; As this is a tool that is closely related to the kernel, I/we try to follow the kernel submitting patch guidelines, but losely: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html; /html/lvs-users/2020-03/msg00011.html (11,557 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] Micro ipvsadm patch (score: 1): Author: Alexander Petrovsky <askjuise@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:16:47 +0300; Oh, thanks. Where I can find out the full procedure? , 20 2020 . 15:32, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>: Alexander Petrovsky _______________________________________________ Please read the; /html/lvs-users/2020-03/msg00010.html (10,951 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] Micro ipvsadm patch (score: 1): Author: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:31:37 +0100; Hi Alexander, Your patch submission does not follow all the procedures, but given this is fairly trivial, and Julian didn't object, I went ahead and applied the patch with (your SoB and credit to you; /html/lvs-users/2020-03/msg00009.html (9,803 bytes)
4. [lvs-users] Micro ipvsadm patch (score: 1): Author: Alexander Petrovsky <askjuise@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:05:58 +0300; Hello! This micro ipvsadm patch fixes wrong (negative) FWMARK values representation: Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn FWM -1412536447 w; /html/lvs-users/2020-03/msg00000.html (8,578 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]