Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Performance\s+issues\s+and\s+optimization\s+UDP\s+LVS\-NAT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Performance\s+issues\s+and\s+optimization\s+UDP\s+LVS\-NAT\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Performance issues and optimization UDP LVS-NAT (score: 1): Author: Marco Lorig <mlorig@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:29:15 +0100; Hi Am 17.03.2020 um 19:51 schrieb Marco Lorig: The setting seems not to have any affect (maybe only for TCP balancing?). Load and drop rate still increases. Bandwith is at 1,14gbps IN / 194mb/s out,; /html/lvs-users/2020-03/msg00008.html (10,504 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] Performance issues and optimization UDP LVS-NAT (score: 1): Author: Marco Lorig <mlorig@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 19:51:16 +0100; Hi, Am 17.03.2020 um 16:02 schrieb Julian Anastasov: Done. At the moment about 2400 VPN Clients are connected but nf_conntrack_count is still 0. nf_conntrack_max is set on module load but net.ipv4.vs; /html/lvs-users/2020-03/msg00007.html (10,817 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] Performance issues and optimization UDP LVS-NAT (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:02:15 +0200 (EET); Hello, Make sure nf_conntrack_count does not reach the nf_conntrack_max value. If you do not use iptables rules, you can disable it, it is not needed for the IPVS traffic. Only IP_VS_NFCT, IP_VS_FTP; /html/lvs-users/2020-03/msg00005.html (11,034 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] Performance issues and optimization UDP LVS-NAT (score: 1): Author: Marco Lorig <mlorig@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:57:58 +0100; Hi Julian Am 17.03.2020 um 14:23 schrieb Julian Anastasov: Ok, i will give it a try. nf_conntrack_max is set to 262144 (default?). I would set it to 1024000. Do you have any recommondation for this v; /html/lvs-users/2020-03/msg00004.html (10,175 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] Performance issues and optimization UDP LVS-NAT (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:23:22 +0200 (EET); Hello, Yes, when nf_conntrack is used it would be better to set /proc/sys/net/ipv4/vs/conntrack to 1, as reported by different users, for example: https://marc.info/?t=134728825000003&r=1&w=2 In this; /html/lvs-users/2020-03/msg00003.html (10,704 bytes)
6. [lvs-users] Performance issues and optimization UDP LVS-NAT (score: 1): Author: Marco Lorig <mlorig@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:19:47 +0100; Hi, we are running lvs for couple of years and upgraded last month to 10G infrastructure. Now, we ran into some kind of performance issues: Everything works fine until we reach at througput of 1600-2; /html/lvs-users/2020-03/msg00002.html (9,174 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]