Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Reg\s+Tunneling\s+IPV6\s+VS\s+to\s+IPv4\s+RS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Reg\s+Tunneling\s+IPV6\s+VS\s+to\s+IPv4\s+RS\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Reg Tunneling IPV6 VS to IPv4 RS (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 21:55:18 +0300 (EEST); Hello, 2 Active connections? From previous test? On the wire you should expect IPIP (IPv4) packet, not IPv6 one. So, we are not sure if packet is correctly sent. If yes, problem can be in real server; /html/lvs-users/2018-06/msg00006.html (12,459 bytes)
2. [lvs-users] Reg Tunneling IPV6 VS to IPv4 RS (score: 1): Author: SankaraNarayanan S <sankaranarayanan.s@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:48:04 +0530; Hello, Am trying to create a Tunneling IPV6 VS to IPv4 RS.below are the commands i used . ipvsadm -A -t [fd21:d1aa:194a:3515:0:1:0:0]:80 -s rr ipvsadm -a -t [fd21:d1aa:194a:3515:0:1:0:0]:80 -r 172.20; /html/lvs-users/2018-06/msg00005.html (10,755 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]