How I tested: - setup fwmark service for 1234 mark in ip_vs on router - add prerouting rule for marking packets if they dst addr == 8.8.8.8 (why not 8.8.8.8 xD?) - enable net.ipv4.ip_forward (set 1)
Now we using ip_vs from linux 4.3, but I have no limitations on the choice of version. I also tested my configuration on linux 4.5 kernel. 2016-04-04 16:12 GMT+03:00 Alex Lopez <alxmlpz at gmail.com>
Thanks! We already using keepalived as director for VRRP and IP_VS. But the problem is how to configure daemon for load balance *forwarding* traffic, or how setup this configuration without keepalive
Hi, Have you looked at "keepalived"? It acts as an lvs director, but also provides high availability via VRRP. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before pos
Thanks for advice Michael! But after research this technology, I have decided that it is not suitable for our problem. PBR is suitable for static (24/7) routers with 2 ISP canals, but it is not so. W
Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2016, 16:17:25 schrieb : Better use Policy Based Routing for upstream traffic. See Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control (LARTC) for the documentation. http://www.lartc.o
Hello, guys. Is possible to use LVS for load balance forwarding traffic in GNU/Linux ? -- With best regards, Sboychakov Dmitry _______________________________________________ Please read the document