Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+can\s+somebody\s+explain\s+how\s+gro\s+$generic\s+receive\s+offload$\s+bothers\s+lvs\?\s+$kernel\s+2\.6\.32$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+can\s+somebody\s+explain\s+how\s+gro\s+$generic\s+receive\s+offload$\s+bothers\s+lvs\?\s+$kernel\s+2\.6\.32$\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] can somebody explain how gro (generic receive offload) bothers lvs? (kernel 2.6.32) (score: 1): Author: Zhongkang Lao <laozhongkang@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:47:28 +0800; So the reason is that LVS cann't transmit skbs of greater than MTU that have been aggregated by GRO. And Simon Horman gived a patch to make LVS deaggregate skbs that's greater than MTU by GSO. ( http; /html/lvs-users/2012-12/msg00012.html (14,777 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] can somebody explain how gro (generic receive offload) bothers lvs? (kernel 2.6.32) (score: 1): Author: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:38:46 +0100; [...] As Julian notes, this have already been fixed in upstream kernels. (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=8f1b03a4c18e8f3f0801447b62330faa8ed3bb37) And; /html/lvs-users/2012-12/msg00010.html (13,231 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] can somebody explain how gro (generic receive offload) bothers lvs? (kernel 2.6.32) (score: 1): Author: Florian Crouzat <gentoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:05:15 +0100; Le 11/12/2012 22:00, Thomas Bätzler a écrit : Yes, I can relate. I had the same conclusions, incorrectly calculated TCP checksums leading to packet drops by the next firewall (in my architecture). Al; /html/lvs-users/2012-12/msg00008.html (11,009 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] can somebody explain how gro (generic receive offload) bothers lvs? (kernel 2.6.32) (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:52:35 +0200 (EET); Hello, It is fixed in mainline more than 2 years ago: ipvs: allow transmit of GRO aggregated skbs Attempt at allowing LVS to transmit skbs of greater than MTU length that have been aggregated by GRO; /html/lvs-users/2012-12/msg00006.html (11,470 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] can somebody explain how gro (generic receive offload) bothers lvs? (kernel 2.6.32) (score: 1): Author: Thomas Bätzler <t.baetzler@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:00:35 +0100; Hi Zhongkang Lao wrote on 05.12.2012 08:41: I don't have any answers, but I can confirm the problem (and the workaround) on a box running Debian "Squeeze" with 2.6.32 directing traffic from a VIP bou; /html/lvs-users/2012-12/msg00005.html (10,636 bytes)
6. [lvs-users] can somebody explain how gro (generic receive offload) bothers lvs? (kernel 2.6.32) (score: 1): Author: Zhongkang Lao <laozhongkang@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:41:08 +0800; I have already googled this like a hundred of times, but I got nothing. I didn't find any page or any article explain this. I'm sure someone here can explain this. So sorry to bother you guys here. -; /html/lvs-users/2012-12/msg00001.html (8,718 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]