Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+director\s+and\s+real\s+servers\s+on\s+different\s+subnets\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+director\s+and\s+real\s+servers\s+on\s+different\s+subnets\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] director and real servers on different subnets (score: 1): Author: Kelsey Cummings <kgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:32:07 -0700; IP Tunneling is supported and works fine under most circumstances. Today, it requires that clients have functional PMTUD (99.999% of clients will?) or MSS fixup on the real servers. There's a patch t; /html/lvs-users/2012-09/msg00018.html (9,918 bytes)
2. [lvs-users] director and real servers on different subnets (score: 1): Author: Marcin Niskiew <nichuspam@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:08:55 +0200; Hi everyone! I want to test solution that LVS director and real servers are on different subnet. Due to Centos docs: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Virtual_Server_Administration/s1-lvs-routing-VSA; /html/lvs-users/2012-09/msg00017.html (9,607 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]