Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+lvs\s+on\s+layer7\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+lvs\s+on\s+layer7\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] lvs on layer7? (score: 1): Author: Emilio Campos <emilio.campos.martin@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:03:35 +0200; more clear yet Thanks guys 2011/9/5 Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> -- Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project http://zenloadbalancer.sourceforge.net Distribution list (subscribe): zenload; /html/lvs-users/2011-09/msg00006.html (11,434 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] lvs on layer7? (score: 1): Author: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 04:33:23 -0700 (PDT); layer 7 is expensive cpu and throughput wise. However one solution fits all applications, which makes it easy for the bean counters to pay for layer 7. Most LVS users have found that the problem they; /html/lvs-users/2011-09/msg00005.html (9,975 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] lvs on layer7? (score: 1): Author: Emilio Campos <emilio.campos.martin@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:58:15 +0200; Perfect, It is clear Thanks! 2011/9/5 Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project http://zenloadbalancer.sourceforge.net Distribution list (subscribe): zenl; /html/lvs-users/2011-09/msg00004.html (10,254 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] lvs on layer7? (score: 1): Author: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:40:22 +0100; It's not. LVS is not application aware, it works purely at layer 4. Graeme _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www; /html/lvs-users/2011-09/msg00003.html (8,939 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] lvs on layer7? (score: 1): Author: Emilio Campos <emilio.campos.martin@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:13:55 +0200; Hi León, I know HAProxy, I use pen and pound for do something similar to HAProxy, but I would like do it with lvs, but with your reply I suppose not possible. 2011/9/5 L.S. Keijser <leon@xxxxxxxx> --; /html/lvs-users/2011-09/msg00002.html (10,704 bytes)
6. Re: [lvs-users] lvs on layer7? (score: 1): Author: "L.S. Keijser" <leon@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:49:34 +0200; HAproxy can do that. http://haproxy.1wt.eu/ Léon _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ L; /html/lvs-users/2011-09/msg00001.html (8,598 bytes)
7. [lvs-users] lvs on layer7? (score: 1): Author: Emilio Campos <emilio.campos.martin@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:31:48 +0200; I know that LVS proyect and binaries like ipvsadm and keepalived work on layer 4, Is there some binary or part of LVS project that create a load balancing on layer 7? Some information about this is w; /html/lvs-users/2011-09/msg00000.html (8,682 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]