Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+multi\-port\s+persistence\s+for\s+http\/https\s+\-\s+unclear\s+documentation\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] multi-port persistence for http/https - unclear documentation (score: 1)
Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 09:20:28 -0500
Your 250/251 configs are essentially equivalent. The only difference is ldirectord is checking a different port for availability. In dr/gate mode, ipvs doesn't modify the port number at all. Your exa
/html/lvs-users/2012-11/msg00013.html (12,875 bytes)

2. Re: [lvs-users] multi-port persistence for http/https - unclear documentation (score: 1)
Author: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:52:29 +0200
Hi, with my current setup, I'm pretty sure port :80 may get directed to one realserver, while port :443 may be directed to a different one. I use marking in iptables, since some directors may be real
/html/lvs-users/2012-11/msg00012.html (11,131 bytes)

3. Re: [lvs-users] multi-port persistence for http/https - unclear documentation (score: 1)
Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:12:44 -0500
If you use gateway/DR mode, it will not rewrite the IP packet (just the Ethernet headers to send it to the real server). So it will go the same port (as well as destination IP) as the original packet
/html/lvs-users/2012-11/msg00011.html (12,279 bytes)

4. [lvs-users] multi-port persistence for http/https - unclear documentation (score: 1)
Author: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 02:48:13 +0200
Hi, I'm trying to follow the documentation here to set up multi-port (http/https) persistence, with LVS-DR: 1) http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.services.multi-port.html 2) http:
/html/lvs-users/2012-11/msg00010.html (10,175 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu