Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\]\s+ipvs\:\s+prevent\s+some\s+underflows\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [patch] ipvs: prevent some underflows (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 22:28:29 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, Sorry for the delay. I'll try that in the following days. There should be benefits from large packets, so better to allow it. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from thi
/html/lvs-devel/2015-06/msg00008.html (11,510 bytes)

2. Re: [patch] ipvs: prevent some underflows (score: 1)
Author: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:17:15 +0300
Is there any way I can bail out of this patch and someone else do it? I'm a complete newbie here doing static checker fixes and this stuff is too complicated for me to have an opinion about. regards,
/html/lvs-devel/2015-06/msg00006.html (10,381 bytes)

3. Re: [patch] ipvs: prevent some underflows (score: 1)
Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:57:34 -0300
Hi, I'm not sure we should anticipate bad networking setups like that. Probably ipvs wouldn't be the only one to suffer from such bad config. Anyway, then we should include that sysctl together with
/html/lvs-devel/2015-06/msg00005.html (11,656 bytes)

4. Re: [patch] ipvs: prevent some underflows (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:18:06 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, Yes, without any configuration (eg. sysctl value), such defaults should reduce the chance for incompatibilities. I.e. we should not send more than 1500 and should be able to receive at least 1
/html/lvs-devel/2015-06/msg00003.html (10,789 bytes)

5. Re: [patch] ipvs: prevent some underflows (score: 1)
Author: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:26:30 -0300
Hi, That will put an upper limit on it, no? If the load balancers share a big MTU, why not use it? Thanks, Marcelo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body
/html/lvs-devel/2015-06/msg00002.html (12,960 bytes)

6. Re: [patch] ipvs: prevent some underflows (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 22:16:23 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, May be we should use min(dev->mtu, 1500) instead of case. ipvs->send_mesg_maxlen = max(min(dev->mtu, 1500) - sizeof(struct iphdr) - sizeof(struct udphdr), /* Some new const is needed here: */
/html/lvs-devel/2015-06/msg00001.html (11,640 bytes)

7. [patch] ipvs: prevent some underflows (score: 1)
Author: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:33:15 +0300
Quite a few drivers allow very low settings for dev->mtu. My static checker complains this could cause some underflow problems when we do the subtractions in set_sync_mesg_maxlen(). I don't know that
/html/lvs-devel/2015-06/msg00000.html (10,711 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu