Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Multiple\s+load\s+balancers\s+problem\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:54:52 +0400
Hello, Hello, [snip] No loop? Because S2 will receive DR method in the SYNC messages for its stack. You see traffic flow or just that there is no reset? Yes, after the failover, all connections that
/html/lvs-devel/2012-09/msg00000.html (10,841 bytes)

2. Re[2]: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: "Hans Schillstrom" <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:21:26 +0200 (CEST)
A silly question, old and new in this case I hope it's a 3.5.x kernel in both cases ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00064.html (12,505 bytes)

3. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:00:59 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, This kernel has everything you need. Is it installed on both machines? Do you see that new balancer forwards traffic to old balancer, i.e. who exactly sends the resets? Old or new balancer? Re
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00063.html (10,812 bytes)

4. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:24:04 +0400
Hello, [snip] No loop? Because S2 will receive DR method in the SYNC messages for its stack. You see traffic flow or just that there is no reset? Yes, after the failover, all connections that were op
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00062.html (12,242 bytes)

5. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:21:15 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, Aha, I now see why, ip_vs_bind_dest assigns the forwarding mode from real server, not from SYNC messages. As you have LOCALNODE when S2 is slave, the DR mode from SYNC message is not used, tha
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00039.html (10,971 bytes)

6. Re[2]: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: "Hans Schillstrom" <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:43:41 +0200 (CEST)
Hello [snip] There is newer kernels floating around in the 3.x range Have a look at ELRepo Project there you can find a 3.5.x kernel that have all necessary changes. BR Hans -- To unsubscribe from th
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00038.html (11,153 bytes)

7. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:24:38 +0400
Hello, Hello, Hello, Sorry for top posting: doing this to avoid clutter below. Thank you for your assistance. Let me to summarize the current situation, after all the changes and testing. 1. The test
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00037.html (15,957 bytes)

8. Re[2]: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: "Hans Schillstrom" <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:31:45 +0200 (CEST)
Centos still have very old kernels 2.6.32-279.5.2 which only featute/bugfix compared to vanilla is sctp. i.e. no bufixes after dec 3 2009.... Regards Hans Schillstrom -- To unsubscribe from this lis
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00036.html (10,844 bytes)

9. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:13:15 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, The last bug fixes that can be needed for sync are from April 2012. No loop? Because S2 will receive DR method in the SYNC messages for its stack. You see traffic flow or just that there is no
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00035.html (13,752 bytes)

10. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:27:19 +0400
Hello, An addition below. Sorry for top posting: doing this to avoid clutter below. Thank you for your assistance. Let me to summarize the current situation, after all the changes and testing. 1. The
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00034.html (23,709 bytes)

11. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:15:02 +0400
Hello, Sorry for top posting: doing this to avoid clutter below. Thank you for your assistance. Let me to summarize the current situation, after all the changes and testing. 1. The test system consis
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00032.html (22,344 bytes)

12. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:17:27 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, I downloaded kernel-2.6.32-71.el6.src.rpm and I see that it does not contain the needed changes to support backup to be real server for DR/TUN: ipvs: changes for local real server and to suppo
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00026.html (16,980 bytes)

13. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:02:10 +0400
Hello, Hello, Hello, We are currently stuck with the following ipvs problem: 1. The configuration includes a (potentially large) set of servers providing various services - besides HTTP (POP, IMAP, L
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00023.html (32,171 bytes)

14. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:53:41 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, OK, I don't know what kernel and patches includes every distribution. Can you tell at least what shows uname -a? I think, running slaves without same rules is a mistake. When the slave receive
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00021.html (20,249 bytes)

15. Re: Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:13:08 +0400
Hello, A small addition below. We are currently stuck with the following ipvs problem: 1. The configuration includes a (potentially large) set of servers providing various services - besides HTTP (PO
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00020.html (13,867 bytes)

16. Multiple load balancers problem (score: 1)
Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:37:08 +0400
Hello, We are currently stuck with the following ipvs problem: 1. The configuration includes a (potentially large) set of servers providing various services - besides HTTP (POP, IMAP, LDAP, SMTP, XMP
/html/lvs-devel/2012-08/msg00019.html (14,199 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu