Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*why\s+real\s+server$have\s+removed\s+from\s+lvs\s+list$\s+is\s+still\s+visited\s+thru\s+Load\s+balancer\s+server\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*why\s+real\s+server$have\s+removed\s+from\s+lvs\s+list$\s+is\s+still\s+visited\s+thru\s+Load\s+balancer\s+server\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. why real server(have removed from lvs list) is still visited thru Load balancer server? (score: 1): Author: "fala" <falawang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:45:45 +0800; I had configured 3 real servers(TUN): RS1,RS2,RS3,IP address of them are can see following: [root@cnt ~]# ipvsadm IP Virtual Server version 1.2.0 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags TC; /html/lvs-users/2006-09/msg00199.html (8,608 bytes)
2. Re: why real server(have removed from lvs list) is still visited thru Load balancer server? (score: 1): Author: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:47:45 -0700 (PDT); I had configured 3 real servers(TUN): RS1,RS2,RS3,IP address of them are can see following: [root@cnt ~]# ipvsadm IP Virtual Server version 1.2.0 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags T; /html/lvs-users/2006-10/msg00002.html (9,596 bytes)
3. Re: why real server(have removed from lvs list) is still visited thru Load balancer server? (score: 1): Author: "fala" <falawang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:47:46 +0800; Yes, new connections get sent to RS2,RS3(RS2 and RS3 have removed from real server list in Load balancer for 1 week already) -- Original Message -- From: "Joseph Mack NA3T" <jmack@xxxxxxxx> To: "Linu; /html/lvs-users/2006-10/msg00003.html (11,115 bytes)
4. Re: why real server(have removed from lvs list) is still visited thru Load balancer server? (score: 1): Author: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:05:59 -0700 (PDT); Yes, new connections get sent to RS2,RS3(RS2 and RS3 have removed from real server list in Load balancer for 1 week already) this is really strange. I don't have an explanation Joe -- Joseph Mack NA; /html/lvs-users/2006-10/msg00006.html (9,390 bytes)
5. Re: why real server(have removed from lvs list) is still visited thru Load balancer server? (score: 1): Author: Siim Põder <windo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 09:16:48 +0300; Yo! Could you run tcpdump on all relevant interfaces on the load balancer and verify that the packets are really being balanced by the machine you are configuring (and post the relevant packet dumps; /html/lvs-users/2006-10/msg00007.html (10,529 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]