|
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 12:33:44PM +0200, Rumen Bogdanovski wrote:
>
> >
> > I think that this approach seems quite sound. Have you tested it to see
> > how it behaves?
> Why do toy think it is sound. It is just more aggressive in connection
> termination on the backup.
I just mean that I think it is a good idea.
> I have tested it, and it behaves as expected.
> In the worst case two more syncs will be sent however with direct
> routing and ipip tunnel all the connections die with FIN_WAIT timeout
> no-matter master or backup. I even sniffed the traffic no anomalies.
> I will prepare it with comment and sign off.
>
> What comes to the first patch I will fix the lock problem and send it
> again.
>
>
> Rumen
>
> > For reference, I have attached my version of your two patches,
> > which I have rediffed a little. Could you provide an appropriate
> > comment and signoff for the second patch once you are happy with it?
> >
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
|
