Re: Should we move IPVS out of net/ipv4 now?

To: Julius Volz <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Should we move IPVS out of net/ipv4 now?
Cc: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, csnook@xxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:52:22 +1000
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:04:28PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Chris Snook <csnook@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:37:33 -0400
> >
> >> Julius Volz wrote:
> >> > Since IPVS now does partial IPv6, should we finally move it from
> >> > "net/ipv4/ipvs" to "net" or to "net/netfilter"? I posted that patch a
> >> > long time ago, but that was before any of the actual v6 features, so
> >> > there was probably no interest.
> >>
> >> Whatever the netfilter people want is fine with me.
> >
> > I think, especially in the long term, putting IPVS under net/netfilter/
> > is the right thing to do.
> Ok thanks, I'll send the patch for that once lvs-next-2.6 or
> net-next-2.6 builds for ARCH=um again (there seems to be some breakage
> at the moment)...

Once net-next-2.6 is working again, let me know and I'll pull it
into lvs-next-2.6.

Simon Horman
  VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
  H:             W:

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>