LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH] IPVS: Add handling of incoming ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG messages

To: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPVS: Add handling of incoming ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG messages
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julius Volz <julius.volz@xxxxxxxxx>, Rob Gallagher <robert.gallagher@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:25:25 +0200
Simon Horman a écrit :
> From: Julius Volz <julius.volz@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> IPVS: Add handling of incoming ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG messages
> 
> Add handling of incoming ICMPv6 Packet Too Big messages. This message
> is received when a realserver sends a packet >PMTU to the client. The
> hop on this path with insufficient MTU will generate an ICMPv6 Packet
> Too Big message back to the VIP. The LVS server receives this message,
> but the call to the function handling this has been missing. Thus, IPVS
> fails to forward the message to the real server, which then does not
> adjust the path MTU. This patch adds the missing call to
> ip_vs_in_icmp_v6() in ip_vs_in() to handle this situation.
> 
> Thanks to Rob Gallagher from HEAnet for reporting this issue and for
> testing this patch in production (with direct routing mode).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julius Volz <julius.volz@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Rob Gallagher <robert.gallagher@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++------
>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Dave, please consider applying this change.
> 
> I'm ok with it not going into 2.6.31 as I don't think that
> many people are affected by this problem.
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> index 8dddb17..5750800 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> @@ -1274,13 +1274,24 @@ ip_vs_in(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk_buff *skb,
>               return NF_ACCEPT;
>       }
>  
> -     if (unlikely(iph.protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP)) {
> -             int related, verdict = ip_vs_in_icmp(skb, &related, hooknum);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
> +     if (af == AF_INET6) {
> +             if (unlikely(iph.protocol == IPPROTO_ICMPV6)) {
> +                     int related, verdict = ip_vs_in_icmp_v6(skb, &related, 
> hooknum);
>  
> -             if (related)
> -                     return verdict;
> -             ip_vs_fill_iphdr(af, skb_network_header(skb), &iph);
> -     }
> +                     if (related)
> +                             return verdict;
> +                     ip_vs_fill_iphdr(af, skb_network_header(skb), &iph);
> +             }
> +     } else
> +#endif
> +             if (unlikely(iph.protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP)) {
> +                     int related, verdict = ip_vs_in_icmp(skb, &related, 
> hooknum);
> +
> +                     if (related)
> +                             return verdict;
> +                     ip_vs_fill_iphdr(af, skb_network_header(skb), &iph);
> +             }
>  
>       /* Protocol supported? */
>       pp = ip_vs_proto_get(iph.protocol);

I see no reference to ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG in this patch, so ChangeLog might be
misleading or uncomplete, since other ICMPV6 message types 
(ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH/ICMPV6_TIME_EXCEED) will also be forwarded/handled ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>