Re: IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?

lvs-devel

Re: IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?

To:	Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?
Cc:	Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From:	Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:29:14 +0300 (EEST)


        Hello,

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Hans Schillstrom wrote:

Hello
do we really need sync_options any more ?
(tcp seq re-calc)

I might be blid, but I can't see anyone use it.
ip_vs_ftp_in() and ip_vs_ftp_out() do set diff=0 and never change them.


        Yes, sync for FTP is not supported anymore
starting from 2.6.36 :( But I'm not sure if any third party
IPVS modules exists, it is possible other apps to use
sync and sync_options.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?, Hans Schillstrom Re: IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?, Julian Anastasov <= Re: IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?, Hans Schillstrom

Previous by Date:	Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] IPVS: Prepare for transferring firewall marks (fwmark) to the backup daemon., Hans Schillstrom
Next by Date:	Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] IPVS: Backup Adding Ipv6 and Persistence support, Julian Anastasov
Previous by Thread:	IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?, Hans Schillstrom
Next by Thread:	Re: IPVS: sync_options needed (removal of some code...)?, Hans Schillstrom
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]