|
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:11:16PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:34:23AM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 06:02:13PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> > >> Fix compiler warnings when no transport protocol load balancing support
> > >> is configured.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> ---
> > >> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c | 4 +---
> > >> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 4 ++++
> > >> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c | 4 ++++
> > >> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> > >> b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> > >> index f36a84f..d889f4f 100644
> > >> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> > >> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> > >> @@ -1894,9 +1894,7 @@ static int __net_init __ip_vs_init(struct net *net)
> > >>
> > >> static void __net_exit __ip_vs_cleanup(struct net *net)
> > >> {
> > >> - struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = net_ipvs(net);
> > >> -
> > >> - IP_VS_DBG(10, "ipvs netns %d released\n", ipvs->gen);
> > >> + IP_VS_DBG(10, "ipvs netns %d released\n", net_ipvs(net)->gen);
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >
> > > The hunk above seems unrelated to the problem described.
> > > The rest of the changes look good. I will double check and
> > > apply them to my tree.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, is a separated patch needed? It is trivial. Thanks.
>
> Yes, please send a separate patch.
To clarify, I have applied the other hunks and included
them in a pull request that I sent to Patrick a few moments ago.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
