>Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011, 13:03 PM
>Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 1/6] IPVS: Change of socket usage to enable name space
>On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
>> To work this patch also needs the other patches in this series.
>could you explain the implications statement above?
>What kind of behaviour might I expect if only this patch is applied?
Oops, left there by misstake.
Can you remove that line before pushing it ?
>I'm planning to push this and 2/6 for 2.6.39, and as we have
>discussed (offline) that combination works. But from a bisection
>point of view, this patch needs to not "blow up" if used by itself.
It should not be any bisect. problems from what I can see.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html