No problem, I'll send out the new patch now. Thanks!
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:40:09AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 10:24:09AM -0500, Mike Maxim wrote:
>> > The reason I put that in is because the size of that table becomes
>> > more relevant/important if you decide to use the weights in the manner
>> > the patch lets you. It would be conceivable that someone might need to
>> > increase the size of that table to accommodate their configuration, so
>> > I thought it would be handy to be able to do that through the regular
>> > configuration system instead of editing the source.
>> Hi Mike,
>> I agree, but I think its also reasonable to consider IP_VS_SH_TAB_BITS as
>> a separate change.
>> Could you
>> 1. Split the patch into a Kconfig patch and a ip_vs_sh.c patch
>> 2. Remove spurious line additions from the resulting patches?
> Scratch that, please follow Pablo's request.
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html