>---- Original Message ----
>From: Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Tue, Feb 5, 2013, 2:29 PM
>Subject: AW: How does the mode fullnat work in detail and is implemented?
>Von: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > I'm more than happy to get this informations. thank you. So the initial
>> patches are not used in the mainline kernel hence can be seen as obsolete.
>> the patches for ipvsadm are useless as its used with the regular NAT mode.
>> Yes, AFIC that is correct.
>And through full-nat, the IPVS does not have to be the default gw in local
>network anymore correct?
>Furthermore, the IPVS itself can also host on the same machine a real-server
Yes, but if you want a uniform configuration
place IPVS into a network namespace (use LXC it makes life easier),
then there is no diff in the configuration even if the RS runs on the same
This configuration might need more NIC:s or you can use macvlan or vlan
depening on the traffic load.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html