On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 09:45:28PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > I arranged the code so that the compiler can remove the unecessary bits
> > in ip_vs_leave when CONFIG_SYSCTL is unset, and removed an explicit
> > CONFIG_SYSCTL.
> > Unfortunately when rebasing my work on top of that of Alex Gartrell I
> > missed the fact that the newly added function ip_vs_addr_is_unicast was
> > surrounded by CONFIG_SYSCTL.
> > So remove the now unnecessary CONFIG_SYSCTL guards around
> > ip_vs_addr_is_unicast. It is causing build failures today when
> > CONFIG_SYSCTL is not selected and any self respecting compiler will
> > notice that sysctl_cache_bypass is always false without CONFIG_SYSCTL
> > and not include the logic from the function ip_vs_addr_is_unicast in
> > the compiled code.
> > Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> Simon, please apply to ipvs-next
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html