LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH nf-next 1/1] ipvs: Remove useless ipvsh param of frag_safe_sk

To: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 1/1] ipvs: Remove useless ipvsh param of frag_safe_skb_hp
Cc: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 19:12:47 +0100
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:09:03AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> 
>       Hello,
> 
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:00:59AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 03:47:43PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 01:39:43PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > >       Hello,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, gfree.wind@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > From: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The param of frag_safe_skb_hp, ipvsh, isn't used now. So remove it 
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > change the callers' codes.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > 
> > > > >       Looks good to me. Simon, please apply to ipvs-next tree.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > Pablo, can you take this one?
> > > 
> > > I think I would rather it go via Pablo's tree and in turn net-next
> > > as that is the normal route for IPVS patches.
> > 
> > I seem to have responded to the wrong email here.
> 
>       Recently we see only few small patches for -next, so
> you can write to Pablo to take them directly.

Yes, agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>