LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Question about passive FTP

To: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question about passive FTP
Cc: Ted Pavlic <tpavlic_list@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Virtual Server Mailing List <linux-virtualserver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 08:39:56 +0800
Hi Joe,

The PCC scheduling can solve the passive FTP problem.

Wensong


Joseph Mack wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Ted Pavl
>
> > However, whenever I
> > try passive FTP (I'm using the ncftpd server, by the way) -- this happens:
>
> LVS handles all single port connections fine. Dual port connections
> or connections which send IP information as data in packets or
> which do callbacks don't work in this set up (ipmasquerading has
> the same problem). regular ftp is handled as a special case
> by LVS. the code for passive ftp has not been written yet
> but is in the works. My talk at Linux Expo
>
> http://proxy.iinchina.net/~wensong/ippfvs/Joseph.Mack/
>
> near the top (Installation/Control, under the heading
> "tested") mentions that passive ftp doesn't work yet.
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>