LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Wouldn't it be great?

To: "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Wouldn't it be great?
From: Patrick Kormann <pkormann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:27:49 +0100
Hi!

The hint about the /all/arp_invisible worked great, thanks.
One feature I'm missing in the lvs-project. Wouldn't it be nice to have a
switch that would tell ipvsadm 'If one of the realservers is
unreachable/connection refused, take it out of the list of real servers for
x seconds' or even 'check the availability of that server every x seconds,
if it's not available, take it out of the list, if it's available again, put
it in the list'. That would eliminate the need for seperate checking tools
and quirks to make lvs a real high-availability system. The problem is that
all those external checks are never as effective as a decition be the
'virtual server' could be.

Mit freundlichen Grüssen

Patrick Kormann         
DataComm (Schweiz) AG
                                        

----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>